Dictating vs. Typing: Why Physicians Should Look at Voice Recognition for Healthcare
July 29, 2015 l By Dennis V McBride
Clinicians can speak
much faster than they can type in the midst of their busy schedules – from
pediatrics to specializations like cardiology and neurology.
Concerned about typing and productivity, executives with medical facilities are always looking for how to best adopt alternatives like voice recognition for healthcare.
Facilities will see an instant savings by reducing if not eliminating the cost of transcription. Combating the actual cost of using a transcription service was the primary reason the market began to accept voice recognition solutions. Many facilities have made the change to document patient data more efficiently with the use of voice recognition for healthcare.
Many physicians into
today’s medical industry don’t have enough time to devote to patients as they
are spending more time with the EMR typing 40 words per minute. Most physicians
are relied to document within the EMR while typing their notes. As a physician
they can dictate at around 120 to 130 words per minute.
Since physicians must type, the quality of documenting the patient chart is less descriptive because the clinician does not take the time to type pertinent information. Any details about a patient's reason for visit will not be as thorough compared to traditional dictation as they did prior EMR/EHR. This is why speech recognition is now being expected to improve patient documentation and allow the physicians spend more time with their patients.
Facilities now recognize EMR patient notes because of a meaningful use incentive program for EMR. Voice recognition for healthcare software is being evaluated by physicians and healthcare institutions across the country. As more healthcare facilities pursue voice recognition for healthcare technology, physicians will need to adapt by using speech recognition. Eventually they will see the value of using speech recognition vs. typing physician documentation within the EMR.
Healthcare technology is a large part of today’s healthcare industry. Different types of healthcare technology emerged because of the increased demand for healthcare applications, including EHRs, computerized physician order entry (CPOE) solutions, and nonclinical systems. This is why healthcare technology is so important in today’s market growth, particularly with changing government protocols and government initiatives designed to contain and lower healthcare costs.
Overall, healthcare technology has slowed down physicians, and the quality of care has decreased due to the adoption of EHR. Physicians who never wanted to embrace voice recognition for healthcare can improve patient care by reconsidering the adoption of speech within their EMR workflows.
As most facilities have adapted to EHRs and mobile devices, voice recognition for healthcare technology has continued to improve over the last decade.
Today technology is much more accurate and sophisticated. This may be attributed
to the quality of input devices and faster workstation processing speeds. Today’s
microphones are designed to reduce the amount of background noise, which will in
turn improve speech accuracy.
More vendors offer real time voice recognition in a cloud environment rather than workstation based solutions. Many EMR’s are speech-enabled as physicians are able to navigate the application with voice commands. The technology behind speech recognition enabled EMR is much better due to the progress of medical speech recognition technology.
The physician will find himself typing into discrete fields using keywords to tab from one field to the next field. Voice recognition vendors are vastly improving the technology at a high rate as speech recognition is widely accepted within healthcare.
It’s not profitable for physicians to function as transcriptionists. Because of the speed and accuracy that voice recognition offers, clinicians can devote more of their time to what matters the most – seeing patients. Voice recognition for healthcare is much less expensive than transcription service, A physicians practice can expect to spend $12,000 or more per practice, annually.
Even though speech recognition sounds attractive with cutting costs, the physician can expect to change some of his dictation habits. Typically, physicians who are accustomed to dictate will generally dictate over the phone, hang up when they are finished and wait for the transcriptionist to complete the document for the physician’s review. With Voice recognition technology, the physician turns into a “correctionist” as he now sees what’s in front of him when dictating using speech.
Most physicians experience turnaround problems with a transcription service. Typically it will take a day or more to receive the document back from a transcriptionist. This in turn will delay the workflow and completion of certain tasks, such referral letters and billing.
The cost of voice
recognition technology is much less expensive than a transcription service. Costs
typically range from $100 for a basic system to $2,500 or more for one user.
Speech recognition solutions can be purchased a variety of different ways – either with a capital investment or a yearly usage fee. Typically the less expensive systems are not as sophisticated as the medical speech recognition solutions. Medical speech recognition provides a vocabulary that speech users recognize. Cost considerations also include how many physician's office stations will be needed with the technology. Cloud based solutions is much more economical than the traditional workstation licensing model.
Voice Recognition for healthcare today is now the tool for physicians to use within their EMR and more physicians will adapt to using speech as they understand how speech today is beneficial for them and the bottom line.